----- Original Message ----- 
From: Carrol Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


>How do you interpret this distinction? A guess: Diesing's translation
>emphasizes that "the truth" as a static entity does not exist but is
>rather a constantly changing process, with which it is possible (more or
>less) to align the mind, but that alignment will be more or less untrued
>just as it occurs. Or is it nonsense to try for an interpretation of the
>difference?
>

it's nonsense.

Reply via email to