----- Original Message ----- From: Carrol Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >How do you interpret this distinction? A guess: Diesing's translation >emphasizes that "the truth" as a static entity does not exist but is >rather a constantly changing process, with which it is possible (more or >less) to align the mind, but that alignment will be more or less untrued >just as it occurs. Or is it nonsense to try for an interpretation of the >difference? > it's nonsense.
- True Hegelian Truth Keaney Michael
- Re: True Hegelian Truth Carrol Cox
- Re: True Hegelian Truth Jim Devine
- Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Rob Schaap
- Re: True Hegelian Truth Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Jim Devine
- True Hegelian Truth Keaney Michael
- Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Justin Schwartz
- Re: True Hegelian Truth Tom Walker
- True Hegelian Hortons Ricardo Duchesne
- Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Clara Ryan
- Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Joanna Sheldon
- Re: Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Joanna Sheldon
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Andrew Hagen
- Re: Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Andrew Hagen
- Re: True Hegelian Truth Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: True Hegelian Truth Ken Hanly