Greetings Economists, Louis Proyect writes in three recent emails, Lou, "What I notice is your refusal to call South Africa noncapitalist." ([PEN-L:13471] Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?)) "Evasion." (PEN-L:13470] Re: Re: No agrarian revo?) "Their mommies and daddies had sex?" ([PEN-L:13473] Re: Re: Precapitalist South Africa?) Doyle All addressed to Yoshie. The brevity of the answers and the insulting lack of content in the last one indicate to me a lack of willingness to do the work of a real debate. I do not think Yoshie deserves to be treated this way. Or perhaps exhaustion of thought upon the subject is showing up and a lack of ability to rein in if one has nothing to say. At any rate I would like to see a higher standard applied to such exchanges. One sentence replies contribute nothing to the scholarly level that Lou frequently demands of these exchanges. Perhaps sometimes a rapid reply does contribute a light touch, but I think the above examples are not so much witticism but oppressive repetition. thanks, Doyle Saylor
- Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?... Louis Proyect
- Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?... Louis Proyect
- Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?... Louis Proyect
- Modes of Slavery Re: Re: Progress (was ... Carrol Cox
- RE: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?... Mark Jones
- RE: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Doyle Saylor
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?... Louis Proyect
- Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?... Louis Proyect
- Re: why colonialism? Jim Devine
- Re: Re: why colonialism? Bill Burgess
- Re: Re: Re: why colonialism? Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: why colonialism? Jim Devine
- Re: why colonialism? Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: why colonialism? Jim Devine