Lou: > >Chattel slavery, indentured >>servitude, & other forms of unfree labor in the history of modern >>colonialism increasingly took on the quality that was *quite >>different* from pre-capitalist modes of unfree labor, *because* they >>were determined by the expanding reproduction of the relation between >>capital & free labor elsewhere (the expanded reproduction of the >>relation between capital & free labor & resulting rise of productive >>forces also made the main contribution to the *abolition* of chattel >>slavery -- Cf. Eric Williams). >> >>Yoshie > >But this is not what Wood and Brenner argue. Aren't you interested in _my_ argument, as opposed to that of Wood & Brenner who may or may not disagree with me on the above? Yoshie
- Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Yoshie Furuhashi
- RE: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Mark Jones
- Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Stephen E Philion
- Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian ... Louis Proyect
- Re: Progress (was No agrarian ... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Progress (was No a... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Progress (was No a... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Progress (was No a... Louis Proyect
- Re: Progress (was No agrar... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Progress (was No a... Louis Proyect
- Modes of Slavery Re: Re: P... Carrol Cox
- RE: Re: Progress (was No a... Mark Jones
- RE: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?... Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re: Progress (was No agrar... Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian revo?) Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Progress (was No agrarian r... Doyle Saylor
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Progress (was No a... Michael Perelman