William S. Lear: > > Especially when it is so far from the mark as to become crude and ugly > pastiche. Bill, don't get into this, unless you are really looking for trouble. I cannot begin to tell you just how unimpressive you are. Don't make me start. Because I have a strong urge to tell you what kind of crude and ugly things you are up to, but I don't want to abuse the hospitality of this list. I *strongly* urge Michael Perelman to stop Lear's baiting, pronto. Mark Jones
- Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia) Yoshie Furuhashi
- RE: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia) Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: subu... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was ... Stephen E Philion
- RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulnerable Plan... Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulner... Stephen E Philion
- A postmodernist reading of Henwood... Stephen E Philion
- The Vulnerable Planet (was Re:... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was... William S. Lear
- Re: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Pla... Mark Jones
- Re: Re: Re: The Vulnerable Pla... Michael Perelman
- Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: The Vulner... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: Th... Michael Perelman
- Re: The Vulnerable Planet (was Re: suburbia) Yoshie Furuhashi
- Back to the 21st Century, was Re:...Vulnera... Carrol Cox
- Re: Back to the 21st Century, was Re:..... Louis Proyect
- Re: Back to the 21st Century, was ... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Back to the 21st Centu... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Back to the 21... Michael Perelman
- Re: Back to the 21st Centu... Carrol Cox