Can't we move on to something more productive?

Plaintively,

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:00:06PM -0500, Max Sawicky wrote:
> Max Sawicky wrote:
> > Selective pacifism reflects confusion.
> > Consistent pacifism is not confused; it's just wrong.
>  
> where is the confusion? if i state a theory and explicitly specify the
> outliers, would you call that confused? if i were to say "i am a pacifist
> in the sense that i oppose all use of violence except when used in
> self-defense in situations where there is a direct threat to my life and
> limb", would you a) disagree with my use of the word pacifist? or b) call
> my position confused?         --ravi
> 
> 
> No and no.  You can make up your own definition any time you like,
> as you like.
> 
> My understanding of the doctrine is that your case would
> be inconsistent with pacifism, traditionally defined by its
> exponents.  But your case is not necessarily a deal-
> breaker, since it goes to an extreme form of non-violence
> (analogous to the dictum that you can't punch
> somebody in the face if he spits in yours).
> 
> We are talking about something larger in scale and more
> nebulous than a direct threat directed specifically to an
> individual.  I would say if you oppose some forms of
> organized violence on the grounds that organized
> violence is automatically wrong, but you also allow
> exceptions, then you are confused.  But you are
> not vile.
> 
> I called the anti-NATO voices confused at the beginning
> of the Balkans fandango because they proclaimed opposition
> to violence per se, but focused their ire on NATO, the net result
> being to support (however unsuccessfully and unintentionally)
> Serbian aggression.  Now I call the voices opposing the US
> military campaign confused because, opposition to the WTC attacks,
> OBL, the Taliban, and al-qaida notwithstanding, the objective
> effect is to acquiesce to the survival of fascists dedicated to
> the indiscriminant murder of Americans of all races, creeds, and colors.
> 
> mbs
> 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to