on 2/7/02 05:34 AM, Charles Brown at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Justin: A degenerating research program often doesn't have a single fatal
> flaw. It 
> just runs out of steam, spends all of its time trying to fix up internal
> problem, doesn't geberate new hypotheses and predictions and theories. I
> think that is a pretty good description of what has happened in Marxian
> value theory over the last century.
> 
> ^^^^^^^^
> 
> CB: We don't need new hypotheses and predictions and theories until we finish
> the project of overthrowing capitalism and initiating socialism. Theory for
> the sake of theory, generation of theory for only the sake of  theory is an
> especially bad idea in the historical sciences.
> 

Sir Charles Brown
MIYACHI TATSUO
PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT
KOMAKI MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL
KOMAKI CITY
AICHI Pre.
JAPAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For young Marx, theory was considered as below.
He noticed that" we shall simply show the world why it is struggling, and
consciousness of this is a thing it must acquire whether it wishes or not"


"Nothing prevents us, therefore, from lining our criticism with a criticism
of politics, from taking sides in politics, i.e., from entering into real
struggles and identifying ourselves with them. This does not mean that we
shall confront the world with new doctrinaire principles and proclaim: Here
is the truth, on your knees before it! It means that we shall develop for
the world new principles from the existing principles of the world. We shall
not say: Abandon your struggles, they are mere folly; let us provide you
with true campaign-slogans. Instead, we shall simply show the world why it
is struggling, and consciousness of this is a thing it must acquire whether
it wishes or not. 

The reform of consciousness consists entirely in making the world aware of
its own consciousness, in arousing it from its dream of itself, in
explaining its own actions to it. Like Feuerbach's critique of religion, our
whole aim can only be to translate religious and political problems into
their self-conscious human form.

Our programme must be: the reform of consciousness not through dogmas but by
analyzing mystical consciousness obscure to itself, whether it appear in
religious or political form. It will then become plain that the world has
long since dreamed of something of which it needs only to become conscious
for it to possess it in reality. It will then become plain that our task is
not to draw a sharp mental line between past and future, but to complete the
thought of the past. Lastly, it will becomes plain that mankind will not
being any new work, but will consciously bring about the completion of its
old work. 

We are therefore in a position to sum up the credo of our journal in a
single word: the self-clarification (critical philosophy) of the struggles
and wishes of the age. This is a task for the world and for us. It can
succeed only as the product of untied efforts. What is needed above all is a
confession, and nothing more than that. To obtain forgiveness for its sins,
mankind needs only to declare them for what they are." 

Reply via email to