[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >If you don't know what > > Russell's paradox is I'll take the liberty of asking > > that you look it up as it's one of the most > > important results of 20th century mathematics-logic. > > Feel free to refuse.> > > > > Alternatively, Ian, you could carry out the task of > looking up problems for all and only all those > listmembers who won't look them up for themselves :-)
Almost as good as the village barber who shaved the beards of all those who did not shave their own beards. Korzybski asked, Does the Theory of Types apply to the Theory of Types?. I believe K wrote before Godel published, but I don't remember for sure. Carrol Carrol > > dd > > > > > > Ian
