----- Original Message ----- From: "Devine, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:32 AM Subject: [PEN-L:34619] RE: Re: doublethink
> no, I only wanted to stop the discussion if the concept of "paraconsistent > logic" remained undefined, vague, confusing, etc., with no specific example > of any sort. ================= And I provided the list -including you- with a set of links so I did not have to rewrite the history of logic, but you seem to think that is a form of cheating. How about the next time someone uses the term *Katona effect* and I ask for context, should that person write out a PhD length explication of the history of meanings assigned to the term, or provide a link? Or would folks just think I suffered from anosognosia? My last, Ian
