Wilde is in the general tradition of William Morris (NEWS FROM NOWHERE, etc.) 
Jim

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Michael Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Sun 7/13/2003 6:27 AM 
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: [PEN-L] John Nichols on James Weinstein on Oscar Wilde and the Left
        
        

        Published on Tuesday, July 8, 2003 by the Madison (WI) Capital Times
        Left Should Take a Page From Wilde
        by John Nichols
        
        Toward the close of his extraordinary new book, "The Long Detour: The
        History and Future of the American Left" (Westview), James Weinstein
        ruminates on an all-but-forgotten tract by Oscar Wilde.
        
        Weinstein, the eyes-wide-open historian and journalist who has been
        close to the core of American left-wing politics for the better part
        of 50 years, might not appear on the surface to be a Wilde man. But in
        the Anglo-Irish dramatist and dandy's classic 1893 essay, "The Soul of
        Man Under Socialism," Weinstein finds signposts that could point
        toward a brighter future for the American left.
        
        In year three of what Jefferson might refer to as a "reign of
        witches," when American freedoms are under constant attack, when
        foreign entanglements threaten to drag the country deeper into the
        imperialist thicket, and when the loyal opposition to George W. Bush
        is so loyal that there is all too little organized opposition, few
        would dispute Weinstein's assertion that the American left is too
        frequently "directionless and leaderless."
        
        Weinstein speaks with the authority of one who has, at many turns,
        offered both direction and leadership to the postwar left. The author
        of "The Decline of Socialism in America" and "The Corporate Ideal in
        the Liberal State," Weinstein was the founder of the influential
        journal Socialist Review and the founding editor and publisher of the
        Chicago-based democratic socialist magazine In These Times.
        
        An old leftist, a new leftist, a radical and a pragmatist, Weinstein
        has held the banner of progressive politics aloft through so many
        struggles that he has passed from being a historian to being part of
        history. And, ever the optimist, he has not given up on the prospect
        that the next great chapter in the history of the American left may be
        no more distant than the next turned page.
        
        And Weinstein, wise as ever, has turned a page or so of Wilde in
        search of inspiration for framing the next left. Wilde's concern of
        more than a century ago, Weinstein observes, "was with the great
        majority of working people whose creativity, 'latent and potential in
        mankind generally,' was stifled by capitalism. By making financial
        gain rather than personal growth its aim, he wrote, capitalism had
        'crushed true individualism.' It debarred those in one part of the
        community from realizing their individuality by starving them; and it
        confused the other part by measuring them in terms of what they
        possessed. Capitalism left people to think 'that the important thing
        (was) to have,' rather than 'to be.' "
        
        When he wrote "The Soul of Man Under Socialism," Wilde's argument for
        the abolition of capitalism in order to free people "to be" was
        dismissed as unrealistic.
        
        "Few socialists shared Wilde's take on socialism in 1900 because it
        was difficult to see a future where such a system would be possible,"
        explains Weinstein. "But here we are, a hundred and fifty years after
        Marx wrote the Manifesto and a hundred years after Wilde wrote 'The
        Soul of Man Under Socialism.'
        
        And while even now few envision such a future, the most advanced
        capitalist nations have nonetheless created the productive capacity
        for a society such as Marx and Wilde had in mind. The technology and
        productive capacity exist, but the vision is missing. The problem,
        then, is how to create a political movement with the will and the
        ability to realize that vision."
        
        In "The Long Detour," Weinstein argues that the time has come for the
        left to renew a few of its utopian affiliations. Weinstein is no
        dreamer - he expects the building of a left that can compete in the
        marketplace of ideas and at the ballot box in 21st century America
        "will be a long arduous task, and there will be many false starts."
        
        But, he suggests, the renewal will be rooted in an understanding that
        the left must articulate an agenda that speaks to the highest hopes
        and promises reforms. And those reforms need to be not merely radical
        but rejuvenating for the souls of Americans, who are increasingly
        battered by a consumer culture so omnipresent that it leaves little
        room for personal growth or societal progress.
        


Reply via email to