On Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 22:02:11 (-0400) Kenneth Campbell writes: >... >I know you have spoken in this thread about "preaching to the choir." > >My guess is you are now doing a kind of "anti-preaching" to the choir? >(But what the hell do I know?) > >Still, I don't think you can dismiss ephemeral improvement as "window >dressing." Carter and Bush are leagues apart.
I see no evidence that this is true. Their actions speak for themselves. Carter, as I see it, has been responsible for the deaths of more people so far than Bush has, for the reasons I gave. >Both men will die. At the end of their lives, what have they done? Did a >few more people live (etc.)? Yes, in the case of Bush, a few more seem to have lived, but that doesn't make him a good guy. >These sound like tiny improvements, but they are STILL improvements. Oh? And why do the body counts say the opposite? Jimmy Carter's smile and peaceful rhetoric cloak a holy murderer. >You are talking about being realistic in non-choir reception of >rhetoric... well, apply your own standards. Carter is FAR MORE >acceptable than Bush to the non-choir. Don't shit on him when you want >better propaganda to the non-choir. Again, do the math yourself --- a realistic standard. The numbers don't lie. Bill
