My apologies for the absence of the source; it was JEL, the most recent
issue.

E. Ahmet Tonak wrote:

I just finished reading the following fascinating article by Sen.  As
the abstract suggests two distinct issues were discussed.  I disagree
with the view that they are interrelated as presented by Sen.  Though in
reality they might.  Regarding the  first issue there are two sub
issues: The first has to do with Sraffa's "pivotal influence on
Wittgenstein" which was already well-established, admitted by
Wittgenstein himself and explored by his biographers.  Sen himself also
says this in the article.  Hence, there is nothing new in this regard.
The second sub-issue would have been a very interesting area to explore.
 In my view, what Sen suggests regarding Sraffa's "education" in  "the
activist political circle in Italy (clustered around the journal
L'Ordine Nuovo)" is very speculative, broad, too general and does not go
beyond again what is already well-known --there was a deep friendship
between Sraffa and Gramsci and Gramsci was interested in everything,
including those philosophical, anthropological and linguistic issues,
which Sen discusses in this piece.  My point is that the "Gramsci
connection" to our understanding of Sraffa-Wittgenstein interaction was
not well-grounded.  Having said this, I found Sen's insights to and
formulations of "the influence of Sraffa's philosophical views on his
economics"  and the way Sraffa challanged the mainstream economic theory
(beyond what is generally accepted by heterodox economists) very
interesting and crisp.  Especially, those parts of Sen's discussion
based on his personal relations/observations at Cambridge and
unpublished material (Sraffa's and Dobb's letters) are revealing in
terms of what really these giants were thinking/worrying about.  There
are also research programmatic suggestive ideas in this second part of
the essay, e.g. exploring the possibility of "combining" labor and
utility based value theories.  And many other insights and the facts of
intellectual history.  I recommend it.


Sraffa, Wittgenstein, and Gramsci Amartya Sen

Two distinct but interrelated issues are investigated here. The first
concerns Sraffa's critical role in contemporary philosophy through his
pivotal influence on Wittgenstein. The intellectual origins of this
profound influence can be traced to the philosophical interests of the
activist political circle in Italy (clustered around the journal
L'Ordine Nuovo) to which both Sraffa and Antonio Gramsci belonged. The
second inquiry concerns the influence of Sraffa's philosophical views on
his economics. Sraffa's economic contributions can be much better
understood by paying attention to the way Sraffa changed the nature of
the questions asked, rather than seeking different answers to already
established questions.


Reply via email to