Davidson has an idea fixe that liberals have to find an answer to neo-classical economics. They can only succeed by dogmatically hewing to one line. Keynes has the fewest assumptions, so by Occam's razor, he is best suited to rise to the occassion. All others must be cut down ruthlessly.
I have learnt from some of his work in the past, but he seems to be repeating himself in recent decades. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So, you’d better write books with “commonly accepted terminology if you > expect to be reviewed (with no hostility) by Davidson-likes in JEL. > > Dogmatism, I always thought, is unique to us! > -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University michael at ecst.csuchico.edu Chico, CA 95929 530-898-5321 fax 530-898-5901
