I have been on this mailing list, on and off, for about 15 years, long
before I knew Louis and Doug. I respect both of them. They offer us
a lot of good commentary and analysis. And they point us to interesting
things to read and think about. I have had drinks with both of them.
Louis had let me use his apartment on several occasions,;even before we met, he
let me do this. Doug has had me on his radio show a couple of times, for which I
am grateful.
Having said this, I don't know why Doug has to keep making snide comments
aimed at Louis on pen-l, knowing that they will be provocative. After all,
he has his own list, and he can attack Louis and anyone else he cares to to his
heart's content. Similarly Louis can do the same to Doug on his
list.
Doug has a kind of passive-aggressive way of attacking Louis (with
plausible deniability). And generally he seems to get away with
it. Louis always seems to get publicly chastised by the moderator while
Doug almost never does, unless it is by way of the moderator chastising
Louis.
BTW, Louis has aimed some sharp barbs my way in the past.
Michael Yates
|
- Crisis at the peak Marvin Gandall
- Re: Crisis at the peak DMS
- Re: Crisis at the peak Michael Perelman
- Re: Crisis at the peak Doug Henwood
- Re: Crisis at the peak Louis Proyect
- Re: Crisis at the peak Michael Perelman
- Re: Crisis at the peak Louis Proyect
- Re: Crisis at the peak MICHAEL YATES
- Re: Crisis at the peak joanna bujes
- Re: Crisis at the peak Doug Henwood
- Re: Crisis at the peak Michael Perelman
- Re: Crisis at the peak DMS
- Re: Crisis at the peak Michael Perelman
- Re: Crisis at the peak DMS
- Re: Crisis at the peak DMS