Hi Mat,
Thanks for these references. Milberg's work sounds interesting. From a
quick look I also wonder if Philip Mirowski's work ("More heat than
light") would qualify as de-constructionist?I look forward to your thoughts on what are the key contributions of post-modernism. Btw I found an interesting set of lectures just looking on Google for post-modernism which relates post-structuralism with Freud's psychoanalysis and Marxian thought: http://mediaculture.podomatic.com/ -raghu. On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Forstater, Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi raghu, sorry, I am catching up on being offline Sunday and Monday. > For Schutz's relevance for economics, by someone well versed in > postmodernism (here used as a catch-all phrase to include > poststructuralism, deconstruction, etc.), a good introduction is: > > Bruce Pietrykowski, 1996, "Alfred Schutz and the Economists," History of > Political Economy, Summer, Vol. 28 Issue 2, pp. 219-244. > > One of my very favorite articles on this stuff, and it draws on both > Schutz and Foucault, in the context of Marxian economics: > > William Milberg and Bruce Pietrykowski, 1994, "Objectivism, Relativism > and the Importance of Rhetoric for Marxist Economics," Review of Radical > Political Economics, Mar., vol. 26, pp. 85 - 109. > > Check out Will Milberg's website ( > http://milbergw.wordpress.com/publications/ )for some full text > articles, not everything is there, but maybe this one, and a few other > very good ones, including: > > "The Language of Economics: Deconstructing the Neoclassical Text," > Social Concept, June 1988. > > "Marxism, Poststructuralism and the Discourse of Economics," Rethinking > Marxism, Vol. 4, no.2, Summer 1991. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
