this is preminiscent of Paul Baran's analysis of the utilization of
the surplus under monopoly capital or George Orwell's analysis in his
_1984_.

By the way, I found a good little article on Dilke on-line at
http://www.worklessparty.org/timework/srintro.pdf. See also
http://maxspeak.org/mt/archives/000199.html.

On 6/7/06, Sandwichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/7/06, Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> here's my understanding: the hiring of unproductive (of surplus-value)
> labor-power is done because even though the labor is unproductive, it
> does contribute to the individual profits of businesses.

Much of Dilke's analysis of unproductive labor (I'm not sure if I
would refer to it as labor-power) had to do with the state, church and
professions -- "clerical" labor in the original sense of the term. He
was talking not only about the re-apportionment of surplus value but
with its absolute destruction. Dilke maintained the challenge for
capital was not how to produce stuff but how to get rid of it. In this
respect, the US economy is becoming a giant engine for consuming other
countries' surplus production. War plays a major role in this vital
service of destruction that the US performs for the global economy.

--
Sandwichman



--
Jim Devine / "The crippling of individuals I consider the worst evil
of capitalism. Our whole educational system suffers from this evil. An
exaggerated competitive attitude is inculcated into the student, who
is trained to worship acquisitive success as a preparation for his
future career." -- Albert Einstein.

Reply via email to