Doug, I've just finished spending 32:48 minutes on the Galloway interview you posted, dated Oct. 13, 2005, and I don't hear anything about what you are talking about below concerning a Pentagon consultant, nor do I recall seeing it in any email I received from you yesterday.
If it is my fault, please remind me regarding where to find what you are talking about, presumably including evidence which would trump everything anyone could use to demonstrate that 9-11 was an bin Laden conspiracy, not an conspiracy within the U.S. Also, why might Bush not be a conspiracist, i.e., a person with a theory about a group of two or more persons engaging in a collective act with evil intention? In fact, a rather sane reaction to the idea of 19 box-cutter- holding men (Arab or otherwise) and a man in a cave (Arab or otherwise) doing as much damage as was done on 9-11-2001 is precisely: "wow, talk about a wild conspiracy theory!". Paul --On Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:39 AM -0400 Doug Henwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not one engaged the central point - that a consultant to the Pentagon recommended the use of selectively released data that would stimulate conspiracy theorists as a useful political distraction. Right there in the open: an admission of a conspiracy of sorts! But the conspiracists couldn't get their heads around that.
*************************************************************** THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001, P.Zarembka, ed, Elsevier, 2006 http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka/volume23.htm ***************************************************************
