Maybe I've missed something on how they're measuring this--not an impossibility by any means--but it seems reasonable to me that if you outsource low-paying work, what remains is going to be the more highly-paid work.
Such an equation deliberately wouldn't figure into this the unemployment of the people who were doing the lower-paying work--and the new hidden costs of supporting that--but isn't that always the nature of these kinds of studies which confirm what geniuses the policy makers are? ML
