On 10/30/06, Charles Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> citing Marx's
letter to Weydemeyer dated March 5, 1852:
this dictatorship itself only constitutes the transition to the
abolition of all classes and to a classless society."[5]

In other words, the dictatorship of the proletariat, in theory, means
the dictatorship of the proletariat's interests, which are more
universal than the other classes', over the other classes' in a class
society.

In all revolutions in practice, though, it's been the case that each
class and strata within it were politically divided (the degree of
division differing from class to class, the ruling class being the
most united class), and revolutions assumed the character of struggles
between political factions each of which consisted of multiple
classes.  The dictatorship therefore in practice meant the
dictatorship of one faction over the other factions, and its
traditional political vehicle was a one-party state in which other
parties and factions were either outlawed or at best tolerated.

In social struggles that do not amount to the dictatorship of the
proletariat, each class and strata within it are even more politically
divided.  So, we have to carefully examine all multi-class political
factions in a class society and see which one best represents the
interests of a majority of working people of the country in question.

This task is complicated by the fact that wage workers in the formal
sector, the traditional image of the proletariat in the minds of many
leftists, are a privileged minority in many developing countries, even
well urbanized ones.  IMHO, outsiders often mistake the sectoral
interests of this or that segment of wage workers in the formal sector
for the interests of the proletariat.  In this day and age, however,
our emphasis should be on working people, a number of whom are not
even wage workers, in the vast, growing informal sector in many
developing nations.

Moreover, we live in the age of movements toward regional integration
with a great potential for the decline of US hegemony.  So, each
nation's struggle had better be understood in this context, too,
rather than in isolation from the rest of the world.
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>

Reply via email to