Yoshie:
China, Japan, and the Gulf states pay for American consumption,
keeping interest rates low.

Doug:
They're lending the US the money. You make it sound like they're
picking up the tab.

Yoshie:
"Lending" makes it sound like they are all intending to collect at a
profit.  :->

Doug:
We're paying them interest, no? ...

I can see why Doug sometimes gets upset with Pen-l. Some aren't
economically literate enough. This is supposed to be a "political
economy" list -- or is it a "progressive economics" list? either way,
people should know more economics than is exhibited in Yoshie's
comments. (Heck, some criticized me on lbo-talk for not knowing enough
about lit crit sh*t. This didn't include Yoshie, BTW, though maybe it
should have.)

The fact is that China, Japan, and the Gulf States are acting out of
some sort of self-interest. If it's the central banks there, that
self-interest isn't simple profit-grubbing since it is tempered or
exaggerated by political goals of various sorts.

On the other hand, objectively speaking, these worthies _are_
"pay[ing] for American [over-] consumption [including that by the US
government], keeping interest rates low."

There's almost always a big difference between intentions and results.
It would help if Yoshie were to make it clear that she's talking about
objective results, not intentions.
--
Jim Devine / "The truth is more important than the facts." -- Frank Lloyd Wright

Reply via email to