On 2/26/07, Bill Lear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday, February 26, 2007 at 10:30:57 (-0500) Yoshie Furuhashi writes:
>On 2/26/07, Doyle Saylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Greetings Economists,
>> On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Bill Lear wrote:
>>
>> > I'm familiar with stupidity and this reeks of it, but I guess being
>> > "yellow" means you are different than I am and are perhaps lacking in
>> > that receptor.
>> >
>> Doyle;
>> If someone says they are a 'white' supremacist. They are extolling an
>> ideology of racist superiority. Calling that 'whiteness' just changes
>> the jargon in a way to recognize that a lot of the ideology is still
>> there but the open avowal of racist thinking is not expressed by most
>> people.
>>
>> How can one talk about racism then with no reference to racist concepts
>> like 'white'?
>
>It's got to the point that even some leftists think that pointing out
>the problem of racism is racist -- since the Reagan era, Charles would
>say.
Good turnaround Charles Murray. You didn't "point out the problem of
racism", you dishonest twit, you USED racism to make YOUR point
--- "white people are immoral and stupid".
That's what your defensiveness projects onto my statement, which was
actually, "it's whiteness not religion that tends to bring down
people's moral and political intelligence in America. . . ."
You will never see that argument in the opinion page of the WSJ . . .
nor condemnation of the atomic bombing and an argument for abolition
of American nuclear weapons, for that matter.
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>
