There seems to be an assumption that if the sh*t where to hit the fan, so to
say, and the Chinese were to start dumping vast amounts of T Bills, that the
US is incapable of buying them back.

 

Seems to me that such an event would give rise to a perfect neoliberal
ploy/excuse to enact even more severe budget cuts to raise the required
funds no? Why should we imagine that the US ruling class would allow such an
action by the Chinese (which seems highly implausible to begin with)
actually wreck the US economy? Such arguments make it appear as though the
US has no counter tactics of its own.

 

Jayson Funke

 

Graduate School of Geography

Clark University

950 Main Street

Worcester, MA 01610

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Scanlan
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PEN-L] uncle sam's banker

 

Uncle Sam, Your Banker Will See You Now 

By Paul Craig Roberts 

08/08/07 " <http://informationclearinghouse.info/> ICH" --- - Early this
morning China let the idiots in Washington, and on Wall Street, know that it
has them by the short hairs. Two senior spokesmen for the Chinese government
observed that China's considerable holdings of US dollars and Treasury bonds
"contributes a great deal to maintaining the position of the dollar as a
reserve currency." 

Should the US proceed with sanctions intended to cause the Chinese currency
to appreciate, "the Chinese central bank will be forced to sell dollars,
which might lead to a mass depreciation of the dollar." 

If Western financial markets are sufficiently intelligent to comprehend the
message, US interest rates will rise regardless of any further action by
China. At this point, China does not need to sell a single bond. In an
instant, China has made it clear that US interest rates depend on China, not
on the Federal Reserve. 

The precarious position of the US dollar as reserve currency has been
thoroughly ignored and denied. The delusion that the US is "the world's sole
superpower," whose currency is desirable regardless of its excess supply,
reflects American hubris, not reality. This hubris is so extreme that only 6
weeks ago McKinsey Global Institute published a study that concluded that
even a doubling of the US current account deficit to $1.6 trillion would
pose no problem. 

Strategic thinkers, if any remain who have not been purged by neocons, will
quickly conclude that China's power over the value of the dollar and US
interest rates also gives China power over US foreign policy. The US was
able to attack Afghanistan and Iraq only because China provided the largest
part of the financing for Bush's wars. 

If China ceased to buy US Treasuries, Bush's wars would end. The savings
rate of US consumers is essentially zero, and several million are afflicted
with mortgages that they cannot afford. With Bush's budget in deficit and
with no room in the US consumer's budget for a tax increase, Bush's wars can
only be financed by foreigners. 

No country on earth, except for Israel, supports the Bush regimes' desire to
attack Iran. It is China's decision whether it calls in the US ambassador,
and delivers the message that there will be no attack on Iran or further war
unless the US is prepared to buy back $900 billion in US Treasury bonds and
other dollar assets. 

The US, of course, has no foreign reserves with which to make the purchase.
The impact of such a large sale on US interest rates would wreck the US
economy and effectively end Bush's war-making capability. Moreover, other
governments would likely follow the Chinese lead, as the main support for
the US dollar has been China's willingness to accumulate them. If the
largest holder dumped the dollar, other countries would dump dollars, too. 

The value and purchasing power of the US dollar would fall. When
hard-pressed Americans went to Wal-Mart to make their purchases, the new
prices would make them think they had wandered into Nieman Marcus. Americans
would not be able to maintain their current living standard. 

Simultaneously, Americans would be hit either with tax increases in order to
close a budget deficit that foreigners will no longer finance or with large
cuts in income security programs. The only other source of budgetary finance
would be for the government to print money to pay its bills. In this event,
Americans would experience inflation in addition to higher prices from
dollar devaluation. 

This is a grim outlook. We got in this position because our leaders are
ignorant fools. So are our economists, many of whom are paid shills for some
interest group. So are our corporate leaders whose greed gave China power
over the US by offshoring the US production of goods and services to China.
It was the corporate fat cats who turned US Gross Domestic Product into
Chinese imports, and it was the "free trade, free market economists" who
egged it on. 

How did a people as stupid as Americans get so full of hubris? 

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan
administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial
page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The
Tyranny of Good Intentions.

 

Dan Scanlan

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.coolhanduke.com

EPK: http://www.sonicbids.com/DanScanlan

http://willienelsonpri.com/arts/269/dan-scanlan-a-peaceful-solution.html

 

Electing is engineering.

Impeachment is quality control.

                     --Dan Ratherthan

 





 

Reply via email to