On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 18:06 -0700, Jim Devine wrote: > Please _tell me_ why you think that theories of cognition are as bad > as phlogiston theory. Why, specifically, do you reject the idea of > multiple intelligences?
Cart before the horse. I'm not "rejecting" anything -- just taking the Missourian stance: I gotta be shown. IIRC you originally asserted that it was pedagogically helpful to have this sevenfold way of defining intelligence. I wanted to know how. I'm open to conviction, though admittedly skeptical.
