Greetings Economists, Scientific American online has this article here: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan
That suggests a plan for 480 billion (in increments from now to 2050) to completely go over to solar energy in the U.S. economy. Any thoughts from renewable economics perspective on this idea? Secondly, they suggest in this article that it would not lower the current standard of living to adapt this regime. Which seems to indicate a means for other countries to follow and develop upon. I'm aware of a lot of questions put out about peak oil that means disaster because oil can't be replaced. Which seemingly this proposal meets handily replacing oil. Hmmmm? thanks, Doyle Saylor
