perf-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• [perf-discuss] mpstat acceptable values Rodrigo Nascimento
  • Re: [perf-discuss] mpstat acceptable values Bob Sneed
  • [perf-discuss] Re: mpstat acceptable values Eric C. Saxe
• [perf-discuss] New snapshot of NUMA ptools Alexander Kolbasov
  • Re: [perf-discuss] New snapshot of NUMA ptools (0.1.4) Alexander Kolbasov
• [perf-discuss] Netperf on identical hardware: FreeBSD vs. Solaris Mike Pogue
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Netperf on identical hardware: FreeBSD vs. Solaris Peter Tribble
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Netperf on identical hardware: FreeBSD vs. Solaris Mike Pogue
• [perf-discuss] memory consuming Sh
  • Re: [perf-discuss] memory consuming Tao Chen
  • Re: [perf-discuss] memory consuming Mike Gerdts
• [perf-discuss] OLTP results on MySQL posted... Mike Pogue
• [perf-discuss] Performance Test questions Justin Conover
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Performance Test questions Justin Conover
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance Test questions Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance Test questions Max Bruning
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance Test questions Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance Test questions Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance Test questions Bart Smaalders
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Performance Test questions Eric C. Saxe
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Performance Test questions Eric C. Saxe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance Test questions Tao Chen
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance Test questions Tao Chen
• [perf-discuss] T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Louwtjie Burger
  • Re: [perf-discuss] T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Eric Lowe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Bart Smaalders
  • [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Jan Wiktorowicz
  • [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Martin
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Michael Schulte
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Andrew Gallatin
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Michael Pogue
  • [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Mike Pogue
  • [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Stefan Parvu
• [perf-discuss] Means to reduce core-dumping impact on performance critical system? David McDaniel
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Means to reduce core-dumping impact on performance critical system? Philip Beevers
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Means to reduce core-dumping impact on performance critical system? Bart Smaalders
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Means to reduce core-dumping impact on performance critical system? David McDaniel (damcdani)
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Means to reduce core-dumping impact on performance critical system? Eric Lowe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Means to reduce core-dumping impact on performance critical system? Bart Smaalders
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Means to reduce core-dumping impact on performance critical system? David McDaniel (damcdani)
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Means to reduce core-dumping impact on performance critical system? David McDaniel (damcdani)
• [perf-discuss] MediaLib: C lib speed vs. VIS/VIS2 Speed Mike Kuhnkey
  • [perf-discuss] Re: MediaLib: C lib speed vs. VIS/VIS2 Speed James Cheng
• [perf-discuss] Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Alexander Kolbasov
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Gavin Maltby
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Holger Berger
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Eric C. Saxe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Holger Berger
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Eric C. Saxe
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Eric C. Saxe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Holger Berger
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Eric C. Saxe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Code review for the "sticky scheduler" changes Alexander Kolbasov
• [perf-discuss] HPC Challenge Benchmark Louwtjie Burger
  • Re: [perf-discuss] HPC Challenge Benchmark Eoin Lawless
  • [perf-discuss] Re: HPC Challenge Benchmark Louwtjie Burger
• [perf-discuss] Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Mike Marty
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Stephen Lau
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Bart Smaalders
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Eric C. Saxe
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Mike Marty
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Eric Lowe
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Eric C. Saxe
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Mike Marty
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Mike Marty
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Eric C. Saxe
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Mike Marty
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Memory Placement Optimization for SPARC (lgroup creation) Eric C. Saxe
• [perf-discuss] pkgadd/patchadd performance Thomas Maier-Komor
  • Re: [perf-discuss] pkgadd/patchadd performance Peter Tribble
• [perf-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: RFE: /etc/system tuneable tosetthedefaultpagesize Holger Berger
  • [perf-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: RFE: /etc/system tuneable tosetthedefaultpagesize Eric Lowe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: RFE: /etc/system tuneable tosetthedefaultpagesize Eric Lowe
• [perf-discuss] Is the following CAS(Compare and Swap ) function preserves atomicity? Rama Krishna
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Is the following CAS(Compare and Swap ) function preserves atomicity? Roch Bourbonnais - Performance Engineering
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Is the following CAS(Compare and Swap ) function preserves atomicity? Michael Schulte
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Is the following CAS(Compare and Swap ) function preserves atomicity? Jonathan Adams
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Is the following CAS(Compare and Swap ) function preserves atomicity? Rama Krishna
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Is the following CAS(Compare and Swap ) function preserves atomicity? Dan Price
• [perf-discuss] filebench: pthread_mutex_init missing?? Ciaran Cummins
• [perf-discuss] maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Steven Sim
  • [perf-discuss] Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Sanjay G. Nadkarni
  • [perf-discuss] Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Richard Elling
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Steven Sim
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Richard Elling
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Steven Sim
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Robert Milkowski
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Richard McDougall
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Roch Bourbonnais - Performance Engineering
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Jignesh K. Shah
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Qiang Liu
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Dave Fisk
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Stephen Petersen
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Tanel Poder
  • [perf-discuss] Re: RE: Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Stephen Petersen
  • [perf-discuss] Re: RE: Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Dave Fisk
  • Re: [perf-discuss] maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Ray Chambers
• [perf-discuss] Core-aware version of psrinfo command on Opensolaris Alexander Kolbasov
  • [perf-discuss] Code review for the core-aware version of psrinfo command Alexander Kolbasov
• [perf-discuss] announce: SunFireFan.com -- Help for newbies doing performance evals Ian Holsman
• [perf-discuss] 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems Andrew Gallatin
  • [perf-discuss] Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems William D. Hathaway
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems Andrew Gallatin
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems Jonathan Adams
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems Andrew Gallatin
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems Andrew Gallatin
  • [perf-discuss] Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems Ezhilan
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems Andrew Gallatin
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems Andrew Gallatin
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems rick jones
• [perf-discuss] Performance Benchmark List Fintan Ryan
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Performance Benchmark List Yusuf Goolamabbas
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Performance Benchmark List Matty
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Performance Benchmark List Ian Holsman
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Performance Benchmark List Yusuf Goolamabbas
• [perf-discuss] Arificial enlargement of binaries to enable VMPSS aks auto mpss David McDaniel
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Arificial enlargement of binaries to enable VMPSS aks auto mpss Eric Lowe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Arificial enlargement of binaries to enable VMPSS aks auto mpss Seongbae Park
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Arificial enlargement of binaries to enable VMPSS aks auto mpss Devendra . Vidhani
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Arificial enlargement of binaries to enable VMPSS aks auto mpss Matthew Allen
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Arificial enlargement of binaries to enable VMPSS aks auto mpss Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Arificial enlargement of binaries to enable VMPSS aks auto mpss Eric Lowe
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Arificial enlargement of binaries to enable VMPSS aks auto mpss David McDaniel (damcdani)
• [perf-discuss] Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events Russ Blaine
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events Jonathan Adams
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events WILLIAM CHEN
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events Jonathan Adams
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events WILLIAM CHEN
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events Russ Blaine
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events Russ Blaine
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events WILLIAM CHEN
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events John Levon
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events Russ Blaine
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events John Levon
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow Chris Rijk
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow WILLIAM CHEN
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow Russ Blaine
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC Chris Rijk
• [perf-discuss] Any capacity planning tool for Solaris? Atul Vidwansa
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Any capacity planning tool for Solaris? Mike Gerdts
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Any capacity planning tool for Solaris? Bill Walker - Sun Principal Engineer
• [perf-discuss] Several filebench patches Mike Gerdts
• [perf-discuss] Updated version of lgrpinfo(1) Alexander Kolbasov
• [perf-discuss] Filebench oltp on Linux? Stephany Burge
• [perf-discuss] umem performance on sol9 Konstantin K
  • Re: [perf-discuss] umem performance on sol9 Jonathan Adams
  • [perf-discuss] Re: umem performance on sol9 Konstantin K
  • Re: [perf-discuss] umem performance on sol9 Michael Schulte
  • [perf-discuss] Re: umem performance on sol9 Konstantin K
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: umem performance on sol9 Bryan Cantrill
  • [perf-discuss] umem performance on sol9 Konstantin K
• [perf-discuss] Compiling filebench in Windows Services for Unix (SFU) 3.5 Ciaran Cummins
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Compiling filebench in Windows Services for Unix (SFU) 3.5 Ciaran Cummins
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Compiling filebench in Windows Services for Unix (SFU) 3.5 Michael Schulte
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Compiling filebench in Windows Services for Ciaran Cummins
• [perf-discuss] TLS vs get/setspecific David McDaniel
  • [perf-discuss] Re: TLS vs get/setspecific Peter Damron
  • Re: [perf-discuss] TLS vs get/setspecific Bart Smaalders
• [perf-discuss] filebench patches? Mike Gerdts
• [perf-discuss] GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware Alan Coopersmith
  • [perf-discuss] Re: GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware Bart Smaalders
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware Alan Coopersmith
• [perf-discuss] Siemens sparc V vs. Sun Ultra sparc IV+ tony p
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Siemens sparc V vs. Sun Ultra sparc IV+ Bart Smaalders
• [perf-discuss] Performance: Solaris vs BSD Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance: Solaris vs BSD Stefan Parvu
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Performance: Solaris vs BSD Frank van der Linden
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Max Bruning
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Roman
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Robert Escue
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Bart Smaalders
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Frank van der Linden
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Frank van der Linden
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Frank van der Linden
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Dan Price
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Dan Price
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Richard McDougall
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD nicky veitch
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Jonathan Adams
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Roman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Jonathan Adams
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Gavin Maltby
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Keith Bierman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Performance: Solaris vs BSD Keith Bierman
• [perf-discuss] Turbocharging an NFS server Leon Koll
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Turbocharging an NFS server Richard McDougall
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Turbocharging an NFS server Spencer Shepler
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Turbocharging an NFS server Leon Koll
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Turbocharging an NFS server Tony Nguyen

• Earlier messages
• Later messages