On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:08:51AM -0500, Andy Lester wrote: > >If we do, then it won't be the Phalanx 100 anymore, will it. :) > >I'd highly recommend against a naming scheme that limits your > >implementation. > >Hard coded constants and all that. :) > > How does it limit my implementation? Do you know for a fact that > there are exactly 100 modules in the Phalanx 100? At one point, the > count was 103, and that was fine by me. :-)
Fair nuff. > >Here's some Really Important modules you're missing. I'm using > >http://mungus.schwern.org/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?EssentialModules > >for reference. > > > >It looks like you've left off all CPAN modules which are also in the core, > >I suppose you're figuring they'll be handled by the core smokers. > > Core modules are phase two because of the Extra Excitement that will > be caused by mucking with them and pumpking coordination and whatnot. How so? -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Let me check my notes. http://www.sluggy.com
