> There's a whole set of these sort of problems.
>
> sub new {
> my $proto = shift;
> my $class = ref $proto || $proto;
In this case, we probably don't want that ANYWAY. That's what I did
when I was through Data::Page for Leon Brocard, and it's now at 100%
coverage, across the board (at least the patches I sent).
> Don't be mesmerized by 100% coverage.
Agreed 100% here. However, I stand by my original statement that you
CAN have 100% coverage on subroutines and pod. Any disagreement on that
one?
> Test coverage is a useful *heuristic* for test effectiveness. Like all
> heuristics if you push it too far it falls apart. Get as close to 100% as
> is useful and don't worry about the rest.
Words to live by.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
