Le jeudi 08 septembre 2005 à 10:45, Ovid écrivait:
>
> Myself, I was happy to see CPANTs and I "knew" I put out good quality
> code, but in retrospect, I do see from the metrics that there are some
> areas where I can improve. I do wonder, though, why Acme:: files are
> included in there. The very nature of these modules frequently
> guarantees that Kwalitee scores will be dragged down. Taking a less
> than random example:
>
> Acme::Code::Police
Take a less random example:
Acme::MetaSyntactic
CPANTS Score: 17
> We should at least throw the poor module author's a bone and leave
> Acme:: out of this.
Hey! that would decrease *my* score! ;-)
--
Philippe "BooK" Bruhat
History is made by the winners and written by those with the loudest voices.
(Moral from Groo The Wanderer #10 (Epic))
