On Thursday 01 March 2007 10:36, Andy Armstrong wrote: > In addition to the benefits of test coverage you're being persuaded > to decouple components from one another so they can be used both for > testing and in the application - which is in general a good thing. > > If you get it right it'll also be a great help to the people writing > the rules. You can give them a tool which allows them to start with > an assertion and work backwards to a rule that implements it. They'll > be able to do their own testing on the rule outside of the live > application.
That sounds much like FIT. Does Test::Fit look helpful? -- c
