On Sunday 18 March 2007, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Ovid wrote:
> > Amusingly, when I was at last year's Google Test Automation Conference,
> > lots of folks were talking about their XML output from their test
> > harnesses and many of them weren't happy with it (having to wait for a
> > well-formed XML document sucks, particularly when a human can read the
> > partially formed document and still understand things). I wound up
> > giving a lightning talk on TAP in hopes of reeling in the people who
> > were unhappy with XML, but no dice.
>
> It would be nice to know what those other systems do that TAP does not.
> Steal their ideas.
>
> Another problem is we're not even on most people's maps. Here's one
> example. http://opensourcetesting.org
>
> Might it be time we start up a TAP-only mailing list? If nothing else it
> would unclog perl-qa from those who want to talk about something other than
> TAP.
I think that's a good idea. I believe many people here got tired of the
TAP-related discussions, and they grew to unpreceded volume.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/
Chuck Norris wrote a complete Perl 6 implementation in a day but then
destroyed all evidence with his bare hands, so no one will know his secrets.
