On 10/2/07, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-01 18:30]: > > So if CPAN.pm 1.92XX goes into 5.10, then there *will* be > > a CPAN client in core that knows when to upgrade itself. We > > don't need CPANPLUS for that. > > Yeah, OK. Still, it would be nice if both of them had feature > parity here, because people will tend to use one or the other, > not really both.
And actually the whole point of putting CPANPLUS in core was that it was feature positive with respect to CPAN, if it is feature negative then it defeats that point and makes it arguable that it shouldn't be in core. At the very least they should be feature equivalent. Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
