On Thursday 03 January 2008 11.50.03 Andy Armstrong wrote: > > Cabie seems to be as good, if not better (psst, it's written in Perl). > Does that make it better? :)
RTFM! In the feature list the authors writes "* It's really cool!". Since cool is better than good, I assume it is ;) The "written in Perl" did not refer to the "better". I would prefer something that I can modify without having to swear too much about forgotten ':'s and '\t's. On Thursday 03 January 2008 18.52.11 Matisse Enzer wrote: > Can you explain your comparison in more detail? I could not find any > documentation for CABIE and so it's hard for me to compare. I did a quick comparison on the feature list no more. I've been following cabie for a while now without using it. last time, I was out voted by my own development team and we used cruise control instead. We have a project starting in a few weeks maybe this time I can use cabie (or buildbot) > One of the things that is attractive to me about BuildBot is that it > makes it fairly easy to create many builders on different platforms > that all report back to a central buildmaster, but maybe CABIE does > this also? I believe so. http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/CabieBuildSystem.html I did send a mail to cabie author asking if he had made a comparison between cabie and other systems. I also invited him to join us on this mailing list. I'll forward his answer if he does answer me. Cheers, Nadim
