On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:20 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 09 September 2008 15:10:13 Michael G Schwern wrote: > >> The goal of the test seems to be to detect that a customized caller() >> routine is not blown away by Sub::Uplevel. A much safer way to do that is >> to have your customized caller() just flick a file-scoped variable when it >> gets called and look for that change. > > That sounds relatively thread unsafe (or have I written too much C code > lately?).
He's talking about doing it in a test -- so I think it's fine. That said, the idea of mixing Sub::Uplevel and threads puts chills up my spine. -- David