On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 04:01:56PM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > * Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-10 13:50]: > > Oh, but they *could* have them. > > > > And I think that is a perfect solution. CPANTS should check > > whether modules have a shebang line, and if so whether it > > contains -w. If it does then the author has asserted that the > > module runs cleanly with warnings enabled and should receive > > the kwalitee point. > > Problem is, the shebang line doesn???t actually *do* anything. > > The correct solution (which also doesn???t require changes to > CPANTS) is called warnings::compat. Assuming you actually care > that much???
I don't agree. I'm with Paul. Why should I add a dependency to correct code to placate the CPANTS game? Particularly as warnings::compat *can't* do everything the warnings pragma can do, so by changing to use it I might be adding bugs. Nicholas Clark
