Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from David Golden
> # on Wednesday 10 September 2008 11:00:
>
>>> If CPANTS can find the -w in the tests or whatever and the META.yml
>>> says 5.6... (Because enabling warnings in *everyone else's* code is
>>> a good way to placate a static kwalitee scanner?) I give up.
>> I don't think people realized that my CPANTS comment was a joke.
>
> Yeah... your jokes need work ;-) Try adding bacon?
>
> But seriously: if warnings::compat actually works on 5.6, why not just
> call it warnings.pm when you install it there?
Indeed, I'll go back in my time machine and fix that.
Will has being done.
But seriously, warnings::compat installs a warnings.pm module that flips $^W
and supports the handful of warnings functions. It ignores categories and
it's not lexical. It's smart enough not to blow over the real warnings.pm.
--
Insulting our readers is part of our business model.
http://somethingpositive.net/sp07122005.shtml
