On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
# Planning 2 more tests at foo.t line 3.
ok 1 - First test
not ok 2 - 2 tests were planned but only 1 was run
# Failed test "2 tests were planned but only 1 was run"
# at foo.t line 6.
# Planning 1 more test at foo.t line 6.
ok 3 - Second test
ok 4 - Third test
1..3
Or would that be 1..4? Having an overall plan violation on top of
the plan
addition failure seems a bit much, because the number of tests run
was correct
(until we added one of our own).
1..4? God no. I think this:
# Planning 2 more tests at foo.t line 3.
ok 1 - First test
# Looks like you planned 2 tests, but only 1 was run
# at foo.t line 6.
ok 3 - Second test
ok 4 - Third test
1..3
That is, all tests should pass, but the test suite itself should fail,
just as happens now if you have the wrong number of tests. Not sure
how you'd show that, though.
Best,
David
