On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Ovid <publiustemp-perl...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com> > > First of all, thank you! This is fantastic work and I'm sure it will make a > lot of people happy.
++ > Thoughts on first order support: > > use Test::More; > > plan(3); > pass; > pass; > pass; > plan(2) > pass; > pass; > done_testing() # optional > > Then, you can incrementally build a plan for those who want it and it seems > backwards almost compatible (since done_testing() wouldn't be required). > > The problem is that internally, TB will see that plan() has been called and > will die if a plan has been called twice. why not call it something else then? plan_more(2) or add_plan(2) You might want to report error if both plan(2) and add_plan(2) was called in the same file. BTW what about use Test::More; pass; pass; # done_testing() # not being called at all. Is this a failure now as there was no plan, not even a no_plan ? Gabor
