On Feb 18, 2009, at 2:04 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Of course if I use -v, it passes `verbosity => 1` to TAP::Harness, but I'd love to be able to see the failure diagnostics without having to see all of the passing test TAP output, too. Is there some way to get TAP::Harness to pass through diagnostic output even when `verbosity < 1`? If not, how difficult would it be to add it? Maybe another parameter to new()?
Looking at the TAP::Harness docs, I'm thinking that output of diagnostics should be a part of "normal" verbosity, if for no other reason than that all us Perl hackers are used to seeing it show up anyway, even if it is in STDERR. No?
Thanks, David