On Tuesday 14 July 2009 02:43:44 Ovid wrote: > Thus, I'm trying to think of a way of solving my problem now, not at some > hypothetical date in the future.
Next option: write your own test harness which dies when it encounters a bonus test. This should take you less than an afternoon. If that doesn't work, write your own test harness which suppresses all information except bonus test results or some bonus test results. If none of this works with Test::Aggregate, I believe the right approach is to modify Test::Aggregate to make it work. -- c
