Ovid wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: chromatic <chroma...@wgz.org> > >> Add diagnostics to TODO tests and let your test harness do what it's >> supposed >> to do. Shoving yet more optional behavior in the test process continues to >> violate the reasons for having separate test processes and TAP analyzers. > > We have no diagnostics. We've never had diagnostics (the ad-hoc things going > to STDERR > don't count because they can't be synched or reliably parsed). Thus, I can't > add > diagnostics to the TODO tests until Schwern puts diagnostics in Test::Builder > or > accepts a patch. That doesn't look like it's going to happen any time soon,
Dude, we had this conversation last month and I said to go for it! http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2009/06/msg12252.html -- E: "Would you want to maintain a 5000 line Perl program?" d: "Why would you write a 5000 line program?"
