* David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> [2014-06-26T09:19:00] > I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days - > and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should > never* happen.
Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use. Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact TAP that will be printed. I always recommend Test::Tester. Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and make releases. -- rjbs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
