* David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> [2014-06-26T09:19:00]
> I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days -
> and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should
> never* happen.

Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use.

Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact
TAP that will be printed.

I always recommend Test::Tester.

Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and make
releases.

-- 
rjbs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to