On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 06:18:35PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote: > * David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> [2014-06-26T09:19:00] > > I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days - > > and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should > > never* happen. > > Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use. > > Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact > TAP that will be printed. > > I always recommend Test::Tester.
Indeed. I just did a search of all my Test::* modules, and they all use Test::Tester, not Test::Builder::Tester. > Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and make > releases. me too. I may even do more, but I'm not making any promises yet :)
