On 27 June 2014 07:18, Ricardo Signes <perl...@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > * David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> [2014-06-26T09:19:00] >> I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days - >> and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should >> never* happen. > > Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use. > > Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact > TAP that will be printed. > > I always recommend Test::Tester.
:) > Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and make > releases. Thanks Ricardo and Karen. Chad (who is making the changes in Test::Builder) has offered to take it over and possibly bundle it with TB which would be nice and make it easier for people to choose it. I'll give him the keys to the house shortly, F > -- > rjbs
