On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 11:00:31AM +0200, Tels wrote: > in my quest to rescue^Wpreserve memory, here is the second patch in my > noCarp series. The first one can be found here:
Are you sure that this is a net gain in memory or speed? Carp.pm is itself very lightweight these days: it is basically a wrapper that loads Carp::Heavy on demand. Since any code of any significant size is likely to have indirectly require'd Carp through some included module anyway, surely now the code is just burdened with a bunch of croak() wrapper functions in every namespace in *addition* to Carp.pm? Dave. -- SCO - a train crash in slow motion
