-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Moin,
On Sunday 26 June 2005 14:16, Dave Mitchell wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:42:40PM +0200, Tels wrote: > > Example with bleadperl (because there "use vars" doesn't load Carp): [snip] > So you can't really conclude anything about Carp.pm's footprint just > from examining process size. Bummer. :/ (Except you can conclude that it went down an unknown amount :) Is there a way to reliable see what memory it uses? (Of course, on real world systems every byte saved is a bytes saved and it doesn't matter whether this is due to malloc granularity or not). Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 14:18:39 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. The best thing about growing older is that it takes such a long time. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQr6dlHcLPEOTuEwVAQGNCgf/UCnFBow1vM5/dfMi5Cbm0lIYlRQSEshX 9bW7Bci1tl1tu6D3xKXBaufn7PjmFvsoqJ8nbulhGush/dXJyTselBRFDtWNash7 V8RQ2mifOPREgvcCQwrSkyjy0cu86XAoS0W8Jyi9nJmxg6otQ9VAbIw7eE+UqMvp TRK8yV7lCVEiXS+MIGaE/ZDdnmTPMNAKBfT7H+1WvGYieGCIeXE6KRt4GncI4Dae BQJzKQGqKkhekd3x619eC2WfB8VytzrTFb7JdQnZN6RP0mtP/8hu1SFxiBR3rrMA CtJRP5QioDxGJBwOipSGaiKqgQXfHr3MIuJtwlBHvphenQgAixEa8A== =P9Kt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
