At 01:11 PM 8/25/00 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Heh, we're on the same page here. I'm just setting the framework
>for that discussion. I don't think the PDL folks yet know what
>they want, other than "better support for numerical structures".
>
>I'm trying to see what's wrong with the existing systems so that we
>can either fix them or replace them. Walking before we run, etc.
Gotcha. Different approaches and all, I expect. I tend to figure out what I
want and then try and shoehorn it into what I already have. :)
It looks like we need to be able to override operations on arrays, have
multi-dimensional arrays, and do some rather odd slicing operations that
give values still linked to the original matrices.
Has anyone asked for complex number support yet?
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
