Dan Sugalski wrote: > to make foo and bar 5x5x5 matricies that you casn multiply to get baz then, > well, say it. If that means you need to define a way to provide overridden > operators in the Matrix package, then go for it and say that. > > Let the -internals folks worry about the Weird Magic needed to implement > what you want. (This is a variation of my standard "Don't get hung up on > the implementation, that's my job" speech) Although there is one point that is crucial in a useful implementation -- packed and typed for the reasons I mentioned before. Since we are on language-data speed and efficiency on large chunks of data is essential and can not be completely left to druids/wizards and their weird magic ;) Christian
- Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) c . soeller
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: T... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was R... c . soeller
- Re: Some PDL issues (was R... Dan Sugalski
- multidim. containers c . soeller
- multidim. containers David L. Nicol
- Re: multidim. containers Jeremy Howard
- Re: multidim. containers Dan Sugalski
- Re: multidim. containers John Porter
- Re: multidim. containers Christian Soeller
- Re: multidim. containers Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Tom Christiansen
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: T... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Karl Glazebrook