On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:17:19 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote: >Damian's Text::Balanced does a pretty good job of tokenizing Perl >as it is. / by itself requires a lot of lookahead, and it's still >a guess. I don't get it. What makes it so hard? If you see a "/" when you're expecting an operator, or end of statement, then it's division. If you were expecting an expression, it's a regex. Ain't it? -- Bart.
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even w... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, e... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matche... Carl Johan Berglund
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, e... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matche... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... John Porter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... John Porter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... John Porter
- New match and subst replacements for =~ a... Nathan Wiger
- Re: New match and subst replacements for ... Mark Senn
- Re: New match and subst replacements for ... Randy J. Ray