Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > In the other camp, C<yield> has been suggested; but > > the conflation of that with its thread-related semantics may not > > be a such good idea. > > C<pass>. Well, "pass" might be o.k.; but it usually means something going *into* a sub, not coming out... -- John Porter
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Graham Barr
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Steve Fink
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) 'John Porter'
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) 'John Porter'
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) David L. Nicol
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) 'John Porter'
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) 'John Porter'
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Tom Christiansen
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) David L. Nicol
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) John Porter
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Tom Christiansen
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel