> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 12:31:25PM -0700, Matt Youell wrote: > > Would something less esoteric like Javascript be a better comparison? > > Not really. Perl and JavaScript have very little in common, despite what > members of this list would like to do. > I wasn't suggesting that Javascript had much, if anything, in common with Perl. I *was* suggesting that RFC 161 could be viewed as borrowing from Javascript, since the idea of borrowing from Ruby didn't seem appealing to you. Matt
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything i... Dan Sugalski
- Matt Youell