From: Peter Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > As I said earlier, why don't we just define a syntax for > *anything* to be used as an extension language, and let > the, er, market decide? Here, here! Peaceful coexistance... what a concept.
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use X... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Philip Newton
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Myers, Dirk
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Garrett Goebel
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for do... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Greg Boug
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... David Grove
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Andrew Wilson